AI SECURITY RESEARCH · PRACTITIONER GUIDANCE
Published research, incident analysis, regulatory context and practitioner guidance. Each article should be read with its stated sources, scope and limits.
Open to read · Publication counts below reflect the published records currently available on this site.
Check the publication ID and date, the source basis, the claim being made and its limits. A published article does not by itself establish an assessment, certification or finding about a particular system. Corrections should remain visible and point to the current authoritative version.
PUBLICATIONS
The catalog includes the published WordPress records available on this site. Search matches titles, article text, publication IDs, tags and recorded evidence-basis fields. Category and year narrow the results; sort changes their order. A match is a retrieval result, not an endorsement or evidence-tier judgment.
ODA3-2026-04-INS-045
The rst quarter of 2026 will be remembered as the moment the AI threat landscape underwent a permanent, irreversible shift. The era of experimental prompt.
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-046
An overwhelming 88% of organizations have experienced confirmed or suspected AI agent security incidents in the past year. Yet only 21.9% treat AI agents.
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-047
Rogue AI agents—unauthorized autonomous actors operating inside enterprise environments—represent a critical blind spot in most security programs. Unlike.
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-048
19 new AI laws passed in just two weeks (late March to early April 2026), bringing the 2026 total to 25 enacted state-level AI regulations. Another 27.
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-062
August 2, 2026 is 100 days from this publication. On that date, the EU AI Act’s full enforcement regime begins for high-risk AI systems (Annex III) and.
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-061
Every AI regulation—EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001—requires an inventory of AI systems as the rst compliance step. Yet most.
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-060
California SB 53, enacted in 2025 and effective in 2026, establishes legal de nitions for “critical harm” and “catastrophic harm” caused by AI systems..
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-059
The AI security vendor market has exploded—but not all vendors are what they claim. “AI-powered security” (traditional security tools adding AI features).
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-058
As we conclude the rst quarter of 2026, the global threat landscape has undergone a foundational shift. The emergence of fully autonomous threat actors—AI.
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-057
On April 28, 2026, NIST’s NCCoE is hosting the rst of a virtual working session series to update the Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) Cyber AI Pro le ..
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-056
The SEC’s 2026 examination priorities place arti cial intelligence at center stage—speci cally “AI-washing” (misleading claims about AI capabilities).
Read publication →ODA3-2026-04-INS-055
The European Parliament has adopted its negotiating position on the Digital Omnibus package, which proposes targeted amendments to the AI Act deadlines ..
Read publication →
